CO129-057 - Sir Bowring - 1856 [7] — Page 54

CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案 All AI Reviewed

hassed.

in

I formally Suggested that except the Cove of Cliner, 10/10

to I, I'ven puore,

300 tol

who

four

(Esly) Hamughing, 26th June 1856 Hongkong,

dir,

51

I beg to acknowledge the receipt

of your letter of yesterday's

date.

are re

of your population, the provisions of the Ordinance should include British

Subjects only.

the

This amendment met with not a Single voice in support, and was accordingly withdrawn

I shall hand a copy

of this

letter also to the Clerk of Councils.

I have, &c.,

(Signed) W. J. Merser,

Colonial Secretary.

June 26th

Colonial

Secretary.

date.

If, as it would appear, you consider the objections I have stated

to Section VII of the Late Ordinance passed in the

Legislative Council

are out of time, I would wish to state that I voted against the Section in question in toto, although I did not think it necessary then to reiterate arguments which had been adduced

before the Council by a Deputation of the Legal Profession, and after fully considering the points made by The Honorable

W. J. Merser, Esquire, Colonial Secretary

The

Edit History

2026-05-18 03:37:06 · NVIDIA / meta/llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct
Live
View comparison
AI Proofread
hassed. in I formally Suggested that except the Cove of Cliner, 10/10 to I, I'ven puore, 300 tol who four (Esly) Hamughing, 26th June 1856 Hongkong, dir, 51 I beg to acknowledge the receipt of your letter of yesterday's date. are re of your population, the provisions of the Ordinance should include British Subjects only. the This amendment met with not a Single voice in support, and was accordingly withdrawn I shall hand a copy of this letter also to the Clerk of Councils. I have, &c., (Signed) W. J. Merser, Colonial Secretary. June 26th Colonial Secretary. date. If, as it would appear, you consider the objections I have stated to Section VII of the Late Ordinance passed in the Legislative Council are out of time, I would wish to state that I voted against the Section in question in toto, although I did not think it necessary then to reiterate arguments which had been adduced before the Council by a Deputation of the Legal Profession, and after fully considering the points made by The Honorable W. J. Merser, Esquire, Colonial Secretary The
Baseline (Original)
hassed. in I formally Suggested that except the cove of Cliner, 10/10 to I, i l'ven puore, 300 tol who four (Esly) Hamughing, 26th June 1856 Hongkong, dir, 51 I bey to ons kinowledge the receipt Wetter of yesterday's are re of your population, the provisions of the Ordinance should include British Subjects only. the This amendment met with not Single orice in support, and cons accordingly inthedrowon I shall hand cop the way of this letter alos to the bleak of Cancils. I have, Bes, (Signet) W. J. Merser, Conlonial Secretary. Jone loopy Leston boretary. date. If, ow it would appear, you envvider the objections I have pisted 5 to Section VII of the Lout Ordinance poused in the Legiolation bromeit are out of time, I would wish to state that I voted against the Section sin question sin toto, although I did not think it necessary then to reiterate argu- vvary-then- -_ments which had been adduced before the Camoil by a Deputation of the legal Profession, and after midd inged punch to the tonne offect by The Hommate W. J. Merser, Esquire, Colmual Secretary The
2026-05-18 03:37:06 · Baseline
View content

hassed.

in

I formally Suggested that except the cove of Cliner, 10/10

to I, i l'ven puore,

300 tol

who

four

(Esly) Hamughing, 26th June 1856 Hongkong,

dir,

51

I bey to ons kinowledge the receipt

Wetter of yesterday's

are re

of your

population, the provisions of the Ordinance should include British

Subjects only.

the

This amendment met with not Single orice in support, and cons accordingly inthedrowon

I shall hand cop

the way of

this

letter alos to the bleak of Cancils.

I have, Bes,

(Signet) W. J. Merser,

Conlonial Secretary.

Jone loopy

Leston

boretary.

date.

If, ow it would appear, you envvider the objections I have pisted

5

to Section VII of the Lout Ordinance poused in the

Legiolation bromeit

are out of time, I would wish to state that I voted against the Section sin question sin toto, although I did not think it necessary then to reiterate argu-

vvary-then- -_ments which had been adduced

before the Camoil by a Deputation of the legal Profession, and after midd inged punch to the tonne offect by The Hommate

W. J. Merser, Esquire, Colmual Secretary

The

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.